If the external source goes through a fraudulent attack, it will directly impact the website that hosts that source. The external sources are parts of a web application (an API integration, e.g.) from a third party. Regarding HTTPCS Integrity, checking external sources of a web application is a real strength. However, resorting to a Local Monitor implies additional expenses for a company regarding its infrastructure. Compared to a regular monitor, the scan frequency performances are better. A user who has an application with 1,000 URLs and only one monitor will only be able to perform 160 complete checks.Įach solution has its own specificities that differentiate them from other integrity checkers.Ĭhoosing to perform integrity checks from its own devices is what differentiates Distill.io from its competitors. While HTTPCS fully scans a website in real-time, the numbers of checks performed by Distill.io is limited to 160,000/month per monitor. By contrast, the frequency scan of Cloud Monitors starts every 2 minutes.

The Local Monitor has the advantage of reducing the scan frequency between two integrity checks: from 5 seconds to 30 days max. The monitors supported by the customer ( Local Monitor), in which the company rents the solution.The regular monitors, or “ Cloud Monitor”, hosted by the company.With Distill.io, you can choose among two kinds of monitoring: Integrity by HTTPCS is one the rare integrity checkers that performs real-time monitoring, which is a real advantage for companies that constantly create and share content. Indeed, Distill.io checks one page after another while Integrity can support, with just a click, the whole application and its external sources. Integrity by HTTPCS can check all the pages of an application with no limitation, unlike most competitors on the market.

Distill web monitor price match